If you had a Clone, who would be the Original One?

The question of who would be the “original” one if you had a clone is thought-provoking, not just because it involves cloning but because it reveals something essential about our ideas regarding identity and individuality. The answer may seem obvious on the surface, but upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that there are various views and layers to consider.

Cloning would create a genetically identical copy of you, leaving it unclear which person is “real” and which is a clone. Some might use personal identification documents, medical records, or personal recognition to determine who the original person is, but those methods would not be foolproof.

A common perspective is that the “original” one is the person from whom the cells originally came—the individual who existed first and whose genetic material was used to create the clone. However, this perspective also raises a question: Is genetic material the sole determinant of identity? Is a person’s identity solely determined by their DNA? Or is there more to a person than just their genetic code?

Another perspective is that a clone would be its own individual, with its own experiences and consciousness. This would mean that a clone would have its own identity, separate from the person from whom the cells were taken. This perspective emphasizes individuality and the uniqueness of each person’s experiences and consciousness. However, it raises the question of how similar those experiences and consciousnesses would be, which could outweigh any differences between them.

Cloning raises ethical considerations that must be considered. For example, the clone might be treated as a commodity or exploited. To avoid such instances, it is important to treat the clone as an individual with rights and dignity—not as a means to an end. This position raises questions about the morality of creating another human being solely for another’s benefit and the potential consequences of such actions.

Cloning also raises questions about consciousness, identity, and self. For example, what is it that makes us who we are? Is it our physical body? Our experiences? Our consciousness? Something else entirely? Can two individuals have the same consciousness and experiences, or is consciousness and experience unique to each individual?

The question of who would be the “original” person raises complex philosophical questions about consciousness, identity, and self which should be given attention. Each perspective has its own set of pros and cons. Cloning is a nuanced topic, and understanding various perspectives is essential for arriving at any conclusion.

Back to emQonnect